Friday, April 11, 2008

The Incentive To Work

As a people’s organization (which we consider ours as one), a significant element that contributes to the productivity of the organization is the trend in “employee sentiments.” I would say that given the long-working hours and continuous evolution of our work process, we always tend to be on our toes and this creates a very good competitive environment. May be, that’s what spurs me to consider our daily time “deadlines” as “lifelines.” I feel that its time we realized the key to balance our work and life. I believe that as we take our work in a more enjoyable manner, we create the opportunity to satisfy ourselves, with minimum conscious efforts.

Here, I would like to quote Mr. Srinivas Rao Kandula, Head-Human Resources, iGate, “Today, the fear of the unknown has affected employee sentiment. They are less ready to move to unfamiliar environs amidst new people.” With this kind of paradigm shift, I feel we owe ourselves the duty to motivate the self and peers alike. Each employee is an asset to the organization and it becomes vital to maintain the satisfaction levels in work. Adding to this is the issue of maintaining consistency in performance and keeping the motivation levels high, despite the monotonous work.

Now it’s the turn of the HR

When an employee joins an organization, the greatest challenge the HR department faces in most organizations is on-boarding new joinees. I strongly believe that the new entrant needs to be made aware of the realistic situation from day-one itself, by keeping an eye on the motivation levels of the employee. Motivational training is still in its evolving phase, but we can always start it right where we work.

Creating the environment for knowledge-sharing activities

I feel there are some ways by which we can break monotony in work and fillip ourselves up:
1. We need to identify whether team members view knowledge as a public good belonging to the whole organization. Motivating employees to share knowledge on any domain they are comfortable with will foster a seamless transition.
2. One common constraint here is, when individuals give the highest priority to the interests of the organization, they tend to shy away from contributing knowledge for a variety of reasons. The reasons being:
o Fear of criticism
o Unsure of the significance of contribution thereby afraid of misleading the team members
3. To remove the identified barriers, there is a need for developing various types of trust, ranging from the knowledge-based to the institution-based trust.

The benefits of a motivated team:
o Motivated employees always look for better ways to do a job
o Motivated employees are more quality oriented
o Motivated workers are more productive

The aforesaid points can be collated to reach a conclusion, which justifies the need to spruce up ourselves and strike a balance between our work and life. For satisfaction in our profession highly complements our social well-being. The more we enjoy the daily responsibilities in office, keeping realistic targets and fulfilling our priorities, the better will be our holistic growth.

By Debanjan Chakraborty

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bro...this is the most amazing article i have read in this blog yet..! kudos man! Its all about motivation in this world of work, work and work....and a normal work-life balance matters a lot to achieve good results... :)

Anonymous said...

Hello. This post is likeable, and your blog is very interesting, congratulations :-). I will add in my blogroll =). If possible gives a last there on my blog, it is about the TV de LCD, I hope you enjoy. The address is http://tv-lcd.blogspot.com. A hug.

Anonymous said...

Hi, this is Jwaala...ur article, worth reading...keep it up man..but u know sometimes knowledge based trust may involve a confident engagement of risk exemplified in walking on the coals...!!! it so happens most of the time, people who talk about it themselves will not be trustworthy!!!!!

Anonymous said...

Long-term relationships depend on cooperation. To achieve this, individuals need to be
able to substitute for each other, influence one another, and have a positive attitude
towards one another. Trust is a core issue at the beginning of a business relationship, but
a secondary concern at the start of a romantic relationship. In romantic relationships, people move from an initial state of wonder to evaluation and finally, accommodation. Trust evolves at each of these stages. It takes root as the parties develop and take risks. It solidifies as the relationship matures and the couple takes a “leap of faith.”

- Yukta

Anonymous said...

Hey Debanjan, I would like to share this with you...

The three types of trust identified in professional relationships are linked and sequential.

By understanding how trust changes, grows and declines, we learn about change, growth and decline in relationships.

Deterrence-based trust depends on consistent behavior and the threat of punishment if people don’t follow through on what they say they will do.

Calculus-based trust takes deterrence a step further. This form is grounded not only in
the fear of punishment for violating trust, but also in the rewards for preserving it.

Trust is based on a calculation —comparing the costs and benefits of creating and sustaining a
relationship versus the costs and benefits of severing it. For deterrence to be an effective threat, the potential loss of a relationship must outweigh the gain created by defecting from it. There must be monitoring and reporting between the parties. The person who has been harmed must also be willing to follow through on threats of punishment. Control of another person’s behavior is central to calculus-based trust (CBT). A metaphor for growth of CBT is tactical climbing, as in scaling ladders or mountains. Parties coordinate their actions as they increasingly take risks and reveal their vulnerability to
each other.

>>>shravz<<<

Anonymous said...

Knowledge-based trust occurs when an individual has enough information and
understanding about another person to predict that person’s behavior. Accurate prediction
depends on understanding, which develops from repeated interactions, communication,
and building a relationship. Unlike calculus-based trust, knowledge-based trust (KBT) is founded not on control, but information. Parties cultivate knowledge of each other by gathering data, seeing each other in different contexts, and experiencing each other’s range. Identification-based trust happens when parties understand and endorse one another, and can act for each other in interpersonal transactions. This requires parties to fully internalize and harmonize with each other’s desires and intentions. Certain activities enhance trust based on identification. For example, organizations and individuals can assume a common identity. They can co-locate, create joint products and goals, and share core values. Identification-based trust (IBT) builds on trust based on knowing and predicting another person’s needs and preferences; these needs and preferences are also shared. Identification enables us to think, feel and respond like the other person.